COUNTIES Coast Eastern Mount Kenya Northern North Rift South Rift Nyanza-Kisii Western Latest Counties Sigoti Girls shut down after dorm fires Two in police custody over theft claims Jubilee supporters calm after court judgement Police deployed ahead of Supreme Court decision SPORTS Football Athletics Rugby Golf Others TalkUp Latest Sports Liverpool demanded Sh 24 billion for Coutinho Sharapova advances into US Open last 16 Mexico book World Cup berth Delight as Serena Williams ‘welcomes baby girl’ BLOGS & OPINION Blogs Commentaries Editorial Cartoons Latest Blogs & Opinion CITY GIRL: Mwirigi, I salute you for showing Kenyan youth that no IKUNDA: Challenges, opportunities await governors NGWIRI: We must seek ways to manage negative anger among Kenyans NDUNGU: Poll conducted in line with the law LIFE AND STYLE Art & Culture Family Health Showbiz Travel Women & Style Magazines Latest Life and Style MY STORY: The power of a dream CELEB CONFESSIONS: I was not kicked out of the US-DJ Alemba Literary works have the power to bridge rifts by nurturing empathy Why the influence of Germans at the coast has endured VIDEOS Search  home news How Millie Odhiambo reacted to Supreme Court judgment FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 1 2017 email print Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo lying on the Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo lying on the ground after the Supreme Court nullified President Uhuru Kenyatta’s win on September 1, 2017. PHOTO | JEFF ANGOTE | NATION MEDIA GROUP In Summary Only a summary of the judgment was read. Mr Odinga stayed with the crowd, which led him to City Hall Way. ADVERTISEMENT By JOHN NGIRACHU More by this Author As National Super Alliance (Nasa) MPs crowded about in front of the cameras after the decision of the Supreme Court, Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo was on another level. She cast off her lawyer’s robe and flung herself on the ground behind the statue of the little naked boy with the fish. As she rose, she said, with tears in her eyes: “I had promised the Lord that I would lie prostrate on the ground in front of the Supreme Court.” As she celebrated the ruling in her unique way, other lawmakers were singing and dancing outside the Supreme Court. CROWD Nasa had earlier demanded a reading of the judgment and their expectation, going by what had been said in the court earlier and the setting of the announcement at 11 am, was that it would be a long wait. Only a summary of the judgment was read.

News
NEW YORK
The Carter Center on Friday defended its election-monitoring assessments and praised the Supreme Court for “conducting an open and transparent judicial process”.
The US-based NGO said it “affirms the observations and conclusions in its August 10 and Aug 17 statements”.
In its first statement, the Center found that the election-day voting and counting had proceeded smoothly but added that electronic transmission of the results had proved unreliable.
VERIFY 
A week later, the Center urged the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission to publish result forms transparently so that the integrity of the entire election process could be verified.
“In both statements,” the US monitoring organisation said on Friday, “the Center stressed that the electoral process was not yet complete and that an overall assessment could not be given until its conclusion, including the resolution of any electoral petitions”.
But former US Secretary of State John Kerry, the co-leader of the Carter Center’s Kenya election monitoring team, praised the IEBC’s performance in an August 10 comment.
DEFEAT
Mr Kerry also implied the same day that Raila Odinga should accept his apparent defeat and “move on”.
“I know what it’s like to lose an election,” Mr Kerry said then at a Nairobi news conference.
Noting that he had been narrowly defeated by George W Bush in the 2004 US presidential race, Mr Kerry said he had “a lot of reasons to complain about what had happened” with the election process in some states.
“But you gotta get over it and move on,” he advised two days after the Kenya presidential election.
OBSERVERS
Also on August 10, Raila Odinga expressed disappointment with Mr Kerry’s role and that of other election observers.
The Nasa presidential candidate suggested that monitors had concentrated on the voting and tallying processes but not on the transmission of the results.
“I think that the observers have not helped Kenyans resolve this dispute,” Mr Odinga said in an interview with CNN.
“They have confounded it by giving basically an approval to a fairly flawed process….and therefore I am very disappointed with John Kerry and the other observers.”
FULL JUDGMENT
The Carter Center said on Friday that it is now “incumbent on all Kenyans to accept the [Supreme Court] ruling and prepare for fresh elections”.
It also urged the court to “release its detailed ruling as soon as possible so that it can inform the new election process going forward”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *